Kubukeka sengathi impi yomthetho osekunesikhathi eside ikhona phakathi kwe-Samsung ne-US Applem isiphelile. Kodwa-ke, umdondoshiya waseNingizimu Korea awuzange uphume kahle kuwo. Ngemuva kwezikhalazo zakhe eziningi eziphumelele, lapho azama khona ukufakazela ukuthi isinxephezelo esihloliwe okufanele asikhokhele i-Apple sasiphezulu ngokungenakulinganiswa, ikheji lawa. Umdondoshiya waseNingizimu Korea kufanele ukhokhe ujusi waso ngezigidi ezingu-539 zamadola.
Yonke ingxabano ivele yaqala ngo-2010, lapho i-Samsung, ngokusho kwe-Apple, yeba ingxenye ebalulekile yamalungelo obunikazi bayo futhi yawasebenzisa kuma-smartphones ayo. Kodwa-ke, ngokwenza kanjalo, walimaza kakhulu inkampani ye-Apple, ngaleso sikhathi eyavela nohlobo lomklamo oguquguqukayo kokubili idivayisi kanye nesixhumi esibonakalayo somsebenzisi. Akumangazi ukuthi yena Apple wamyisa enkantolo, wafuna isinxephezelo esikhulu.
Inketho embi kakhulu
Okuthokozisayo wukuthi ngizozinxephezela Apple akazange avikele kakhulu kunalokho wazama ukunyakaza kakhulu ngobude bakhe. Ingxabano enkulu ibimayelana nokuthi kubalwe yini isinxephezelo enanini eliphelele lama-smartphones athengisiwe aphula umthetho noma kusukela nje enanini lezingxenye ezephule ilungelo lobunikazi. Vele, inketho yesibili izoba mnandi kakhulu ku-Samsung. Nokho, ekugcineni lokhu akuzange kuphumelele, futhi iNkantolo Yokudlulisa Amacala yase-US yanquma ukuthi kufanele ikhokhele umnikazi wayo inani elishiwo ngenhla, elicabangela inani lentengo lama-smartphones aphula amalungelo obunikazi.
Yize kusobala ukuthi ukukhokha le mali ngeke kubhubhise i-Samsung, kuwukuphazamiseka impela. Le ngxabano idale isibonelo ezinye izinkampani ezimangalela i-Samsung ngezinto ezifanayo ezingathembela kuso esikhathini esizayo. Ngenxa yalokhu, i-Samsung ingalahlekelwa ngaphezu “kwengxenye” yezigidigidi zamadola.
